The usual starting point for defining standards and practices for cost-effectiveness evaluations is the California Stand

Usable once revised. A reviewer wants the wording tightened first.

Status

• Review verdict: revise
• Reusable as written: no
• Issues found: citation_risk, client_specific
• Reviewer note: Text references a specific California standard (SPM) which may not apply to all issuers. Requires genericization or context-specific validation before reuse.

Text

The usual starting point for defining standards and practices for cost-effectiveness evaluations is the California Standard Practice Manual: Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Programs (SPM), which sets out the major tests used most commonly to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EE&PDR measures and programs. These tests are:

Applicability

• Section: technical_approach (corpus label other)
• Scope: mixed_context
• Observed documents: 5
• Years: 2011 to 2016
• Issuers: Idaho Power Company;ONTARIO POWER AUTHORITY
• Program types: demand_response;residential
• Jurisdictions: Idaho;Oregon

Sources

• [F000493, paragraph:873]
• [F021171, paragraph:255]
• [F021298, paragraph:244]
• [F023038, paragraph:222]
• [F023559, paragraph:306]