Work Plan Tasks
- Tier: core
- Observed in 196 of 242 proposals (81.0%).
- Median relative position:
0.141. - Median length units:
20.5. - Canonical core candidate:
true.
When to use
Write this section when a solicitation asks for work plan tasks content, or when the RFP's own outline has a slot in this position. Observed in 81.0% of proposals, at roughly position 0.141 of the document, which is where reviewers look for it.
Read the style guide and do-not-fabricate before drafting. Requirements in the current RFP override everything on this page.
These are corpus observations, not mandatory defaults. Current RFP requirements control.
Evidence
- Key Project Initiation Tasks [F000493, paragraph:1029]
- Task 1: Establish Evaluation Framework, Guidelines, and Evaluation Plan [F000554, paragraph:147]
- Task 1.1 - Maintain Act 129 Evaluation Framework [F000554, paragraph:149]
- Task 1.2 - Develop Portfolio Level Evaluation Plans [F000554, paragraph:158]
- Detailed Work Plan [F000554, paragraph:331]
- Task 2: Gross Impact Evaluation [F000554, paragraph:336]
- Task 3: perform NEt Impact and process evaluations of EE&C programs [F000554, paragraph:449]
- Task 4: Reporting and Cost Effectiveness Analysis [F000554, paragraph:466]
- Task 5: Program Evaluation Support [F000554, paragraph:508]
- Evaluation Budget by Firm and Task [F000554, paragraph:710]
- Task 1: Establish Framework, Guidelines, and Evaluation Plan [F000554, paragraph:911]
- Task 1.1: Evaluation Framework [F000554, paragraph:914]
- Task 1.2 Evaluation Plan [F000554, paragraph:918]
- Key Dates and Task Timeline [F000554, paragraph:921]
- Task 2: Conduct Impact Evaluations [F000554, paragraph:930]
- Task 2.1: Tracking System Review and Sampling [F000554, paragraph:933]
- Task 2.2: Sampling for PJM [F000554, paragraph:936]
- Task 2.3: Develop Data Acquisition Framework [F000554, paragraph:939]
- Task 2.4: Data Acquisition [F000554, paragraph:942]
- Task 2.5: Data Acquisition - PJM [F000554, paragraph:945]
Exemplars
Task 1: Establish Evaluation Framework, Guidelines, and Evaluation Plan As specified within the RFP, we take an active role in the development maintenance of the PA Evaluation Framework, and we also develop a portfolio evaluation plan that meets requirements in the PA Evaluation Framework.
Source: [F000554, paragraph:147]
Task 1.1 - Maintain Act 129 Evaluation Framework Although authorship of the Act 129 Evaluation Framework resides with the Statewide Evaluator, the SWE regularly consults EDC evaluators in regard to modifications or additions to the Evaluation Framework. In this subtask, we take an active participatory role in the maintenance of the Act 129 Evaluation Framework.
Source: [F000554, paragraph:149]
Task 1.2 - Develop Portfolio Level Evaluation Plans For Phase III, our portfolio evaluation plan will serve not only as a document to satisfy Act 129 Evaluation Framework requirements, but will also serve as a detailed activity guide and technical/operational reference to team members. Our approach to evaluation planning is discussed below. Describe Programs We begin with an overview of the portfolio, and map out the various programs and their components.
Source: [F000554, paragraph:158]
Reusable Candidates
- BLK-D6601F6C964620 -
evergreen_candidate, 16 documents, approve - BLK-64C03BBFD48F1F -
evergreen_candidate, 7 documents, approve - BLK-BC131B856A3239 -
evergreen_candidate, 7 documents, approve - BLK-071DB76FF665FD -
evergreen_candidate, 6 documents, approve - BLK-59E97AC38A5DB3 -
evergreen_candidate, 5 documents, approve - BLK-FB88D765CD4FA9 -
evergreen_candidate, 5 documents, approve - BLK-15B4428D585BE5 -
mixed_context, 4 documents, approve - BLK-1B077063C51787 -
mixed_context, 4 documents, approve - BLK-A4FDE61BC83913 -
mixed_context, 4 documents, approve - BLK-CCBE300B3F0DEC -
mixed_context, 4 documents, approve - BLK-CDD4EF7338D4D9 -
mixed_context, 4 documents, approve - BLK-DE6E167399708E -
mixed_context, 4 documents, approve