As can be seen, we expect the feedback to be a two-way process in which we as evaluators offer information and recommend

Cleared for reuse. Confirm the cited sources still say this before you paste it.

Status

• Review verdict: approve
• Reusable as written: yes
• Issues found: generic_usable
• Reviewer note: Text describes generic evaluation methodology without specific names, dates, figures, or client details. It is reusable boilerplate for proposal sections on process and transparency.

Text

As can be seen, we expect the feedback to be a two-way process in which we as evaluators offer information and recommendations and the program implementers have an opportunity to respond. This must be done in an open and transparent way so that the evaluators can maintain the “arms-length” relationship. The key advantage of this approach and the open sharing of this information is that there are no surprises for any of the parties involved.

Applicability

• Section: pricing
• Scope: evergreen_candidate
• Observed documents: 7
• Years: 2014 to 2022
• Issuers: Company Background 1;NIPSCO: An affiliate of NiSource Corporate Services Company (“Owner”).;NiSource Corporate Services Company (“NiSource”)
• Program types: commercial_industrial;demand_response;low_income;multifamily;portfolio;residential;small_business
• Jurisdictions: Arkansas;Indiana;Louisiana;Minnesota;Mississippi;Oklahoma;Texas

Sources

• [F001667, paragraph:191]
• [F002326, paragraph:160]
• [F004563, paragraph:97]
• [F012483, paragraph:190]
• [F023850, paragraph:196]
• [F024491, paragraph:170]
• [F029166, paragraph:181]